Old affair leads to attempted murder of man in Pearl River

By Erik Sanzenbach
St. Tammany News
Published on Friday, September 11, 2009 8:59 AM CDT



An argument between a Pearl River couple over a love affair that happened 15 years ago resulted in the husband being shot twice and his wife jailed on a charge of attempted second-degree murder.

According to the St. Tammany Sheriff’s Office spokesman Capt. George Bonnett, the incident started Tuesday afternoon at the Davis house at 37447 Earl Bennett Road in Pearl River, Connie Davis, 53 questioned her husband about an affair he had over 15 years ago. When Mr. Davis admitted to having the affair, Connie allegedly pointed a .410 gauge handgun at her husband and fired five times.

The gun, nicknamed “The Judge,” is a revolver capable of shooting shotgun shells, which were loaded with birdshot, Bonnett said. Mr. Davis was hit twice in the back as he tried to run away into his back yard. Connie Davis then got into her car and drove away.

After running outside, Mr. Davis notified co-workers with a two-way radio. Bonnett said the man did not have a cell phone with him. The husband’s co-workers then called 911.

When Sheriff’s deputies arrived at the house, they found a shaken Mr. Davis sitting in a swing in the front yard. He was taken to the St. Tammany Heart Hospital and released after treatment.

Bonnett said deputies located Connie Davis in her car on Gause Boulevard in Slidell a short time after the shooting. Deputies found a spent shotgun shell in her pocket and the gun on the front seat of the car. She was arrested without incident. Davis was booked with attempted second-degree murder and is in the St. Tammany Jail on a $75,000 bond.


Comments

18 comment(s)

    andrea wrote on Sep 23, 2009 4:30 PM:

    " to lynn:
    I SURE HOPE YOUR HUSBAND IS A BETTER FRIEND TO HER SON(WHOM I DEFINATELY KNOW)EVERYONE IS ENTITLED TO AN OPINION,BUT OUT OF RESPECT FOR HER SON AND DAUGHTER,YOU SHOULD NOT BE GOSSIPING.WHO KNOWS WHAT YOU WOULD DO IN A SITUATTION LIKE THAT.....FOR ALL YOU KNOW MAYBE YOU SHOULD BE KEEPN TRACK OF YOUR MAN NOW..BUT ANYWAY I WISH THE FAMILY ALL THE BEST,EVERYONE MAKES MISTAKES AND THERES ONLY ONE PERSON YOU REALLY EVER HAVE TO ANSWER TOO. "

    Lucinda wrote on Sep 19, 2009 3:41 PM:

    " He found out the hard way that it's never just a matter of being a long time ago and I didn't leave you. Makes me laugh that a man would think that makes it okay. I'm glad she didn't kill him but I guess it's time he paid his debt to her. I don't condone shooting anybody but she did it and he didn't deserve to get away with it.

    And, if she's so crazy, why is he still with her? Maybe he's not such a clear thinker himself. People who know her don't think she's crazy. "

    lynn wrote on Sep 18, 2009 6:40 PM:

    " WELL HE LOOKED AT IT AS IT HAPPENED 15 YEARS AGO AND HE IS STILL MARRIED TO HER THE ONLY WAY SHE FOUND OUT WAS SHE WAS ON THE INTERNET TALKING TO PEOPLE AND THE GIRL HE CHEATED WITH ASKED IF HE WAS STILL AROUND AND SHE STARTED ASKING HOW SHE KNEW HIM. WELL SHE TOLD HER THAT THEY WERE TOGETHER 15 YEARS AGO SO SHE WENT TO WHERE HE WAS ASKED HIM IF HE HAD BEEN WITH ANOTHER WOMAN AND WHEN HE SAID 15 YEARS AGO BUT IM STILL WITH YOU AND SHE SHOT HIM.SHE IS ALWAYS BEEN CRAZY "

    Nelly C wrote on Sep 17, 2009 8:50 AM:

    " Why is everyone pickin on me, I agree with Teresa. They should have gone after the Vice President, and to be honest, they should let Mrs Davis go. A cheaten no good husband is no good for no one.
    Lets not forget the differences here, the Vice President was hunting with a bunch of white rich folks, who were probably overjoyed to just be in the company of the vice president, and Mrs Davis was sitting in a room with a loser. The VP's pals probably were pretecting him, and Mrs Davis's husband, well we all saw the story. "

    Lucinda wrote on Sep 16, 2009 3:02 PM:

    " I was replying to Lynn's post, not Nelly's. Pardon. "

    getsmart wrote on Sep 16, 2009 1:04 PM:

    " well for one when the other lady suppot to have shot at her hubbie she got charged attemted first degree murder.so why this person get second degree.it happend the same way "

    teresa wrote on Sep 15, 2009 6:59 PM:

    " Nelly, you try accidentally shooting someone in the face on a hunting trip, and see if all that happens to you is that the shooting victim apologizes to you for the inconvenience.

    Have you really never heard of criminal negligence?

    If we accept St. Tammany's judgment that shooting someone with bird shot is life-threatening, then at the very least there should have been an investigation of the Cheney matter. "

    Lucinda wrote on Sep 15, 2009 5:15 PM:

    " Sounds like that might just be hearsay, Nelly. Maybe the husband, who is the only one besides her who heard anything she or he may have said, could be putting out some good words for the prosecution of his wife.

    He started telling the police as soon as they showed up that his wife was crazy. She's crazy? He's the cheater. His word wouldn't hold a lot of weight with me.

    A scoundrel will say anything to get what he wants. "

    Nelly C wrote on Sep 15, 2009 2:36 PM:

    " The Vice President of the United States on a hunting trip accidently shoots a member of the hunting party, no charges filed. An angry woman shoots at a cheating husband, charges pressed. This is clearly a miscarraige of justice. I would bet this was motivated by religious diverences, or maybe race, because the situations where these two incidents occured were so close that it is impossible to tell them apart. Where oh where is the justice in this country? "

    lynn wrote on Sep 15, 2009 2:15 PM:

    " I ACTUALLY KNOW THE COUPLE MY HUSBAND IS VERY GOOD FRIENDS WITH THERE SON.. HE HAS 4 1 MIL DOLLAR LIFE INSURANCE. AND SHE SAID THATS WHAT SHE WANTED FROM HIM. + HE HAS A FEW 18 WHEELERS AND SHE WANTED THEM PAYED OFF "

    R. SIDE wrote on Sep 15, 2009 12:09 PM:

    " I am with Terresa on this one. Just because the Cheney insident was a mistake, he should have still been charged. If he were a democrat he would probably be in jail as we speak. Is there a statute of limitations related to lying, cheating, and adultry, I think not! This cheater got what he deserved. We should protest city call to get Ms Davis out, or at least hold a fund raiser to get her bond. "

    Anne wrote on Sep 15, 2009 8:56 AM:

    " Teresa is confused?? Because one was an accident. Stupid and careless, but not intentional. This woman meant to shoot him even if her aim was off a bit. I'd have kicked him in the butt from here to next century, then divorced him. But to shoot him? Good grief! "

    teresa wrote on Sep 14, 2009 6:17 PM:

    " I'm confused about why it's no big deal when Cheney shot a man in the face with bird shot (he didn't even get a citation for being careless), yet this situation is "attempted murder." "

    Lucinda wrote on Sep 14, 2009 12:52 PM:

    " I heard the man was a rat and he deserved to be divorced at the very least.

    I feel sorry for this woman, because she was the good one in the marriage, and a very sweet person, but she must have felt she was pushed over the limit and just didn't care anymore.
    What goes around, comes around. He had it coming.

    She, however, should not have hurt herself even worse than she's already been hurt in this marriage. Maybe she's fine with what she did. I hope so because he'll make her pay. "

    Anne wrote on Sep 14, 2009 8:54 AM:

    " Funny story?? Wow! Smells like a couple of women who've been cheated on before. I wouldn't like to discover that my hubby had done that, but I certainly wouldn't think he deserved to be shot. Divorced and 'taken to the cleaners'? Absolutely! Shot, killed, or maimed? No way. Crazy people in the world today! No wonder the news is full of sad stories. "

    PATTY BURTON wrote on Sep 13, 2009 7:48 PM:

    " I can relate I have a ccw licence. I would not have missed I would have had a Glock 17. Thats sort of a funny story. What a cry baby her husband was he was not even hurt "

    John Gipson wrote on Sep 12, 2009 4:13 PM:

    " Why would you say she had a right to shoot Mr. Barry, over something that happened 15 years agog. You must be crazy in your head. Like you have never made a misstake before, OKAY miss perfect, sorry but I think you wrote your statement without thinking and if you did think and steal wrote that, you need help also! "

    jan white wrote on Sep 11, 2009 2:11 PM:

    " she should have been target practicing first to make sure she did not miss

    good for him he deserves everything he got "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The St. Tammany News is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in thesttammanynews.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the St. Tammany News. The St. Tammany News does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized St. Tammany News spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count: