Voters heard; raise vetoed

Local lawmakers vow to keep working for good government

By Matthew Penix
St. Tammany News
Published on Wednesday, July 2, 2008 9:24 AM CDT



Local legislators vowed this week to plow forward with Gov. Bobby Jindal’s agenda despite the governor’s backpedaling on promise not to veto a controversial 120 percent legislative pay raise.

“It does not affect me one iota,” said state Rep. Greg Cromer, R-Slidell, who voted for the pay raise. “I was voted (into office) to do what is best for the citizens of Louisiana, and that’s what I’m going to do.”

On Monday, Jindal vetoed the pay raise bill offered by Sen. Ann Duplessis, D- New Orleans, that would have more than doubled legislators salaries from $17,500 to $37,500. The veto came after public outrage over the increase erupted on talk radio and Internet blogs and recall positions rolled in, calling for the ousting of Jindal and his top allies, as well as House speaker Jim Tucker, R-Terrytown, who championed the raise, and others.

Although Jindal said legislators have a “right to be angry with me,” he admits “I made a mistake” by telling legislators he would not veto the measure.

“I clearly made a mistake by telling the Legislature that I would allow them to handle their own affairs,” Jindal said. “As with all mistakes, you can either correct them or compound them. I am choosing to correct my mistake now.”

Jindal originally said if he issued a veto, lawmakers would likely lend frail support, if any at all, to his agendas in upcoming legislative sessions. And after passing reforms that included boosting Louisiana ethics laws from among the worst to best in the nation, he couldn’t afford to lose momentum.

“I was trying to preserve our reform agenda and our momentum by tolerating this legislative pay raise that I knew was completely excessive,” Jindal said. “But the two cannot coexist.”

The pay raise, the first for lawmakers since 1980, would have made Louisiana legislators the highest-paid in the South and the 14th highest paid in the country, according to data from the National Conference of State Legislatures. The bill gained final approval in the House and Senate by slim margins.

But critics noted that Jindal promised to “prohibit” such a pay raise during gubernatorial campaigns last year, and legislators like Sen. Jack Donahue, R-Mandeville, praised Jindal for sticking to his word.

Donahue, who voted against the raise and declined to accept the money, called Jindal’s veto a breath of fresh air breezing through the halls of the Capitol.

“We might actually have a new system in Louisiana where voters actually run the state,” he said. “Imagine that the people of Louisiana really run Louisiana. Isn’t that something?”

“The right amount of people brought the right amount of ruckus” to bring change, he said.

Donahue, along with other local lawmakers, squashed the notion that legislators now won’t support Jindal’s agenda.

“There could be some animosity,” Donahue said of the veto, but the next regular session isn’t until next spring and by then “certainly there is time to mend fences.”

“It would be hard for me to believe this issue would stop good government from happening in Louisiana,” he said.

State Rep. Tim Burns, R-Mandeville, agreed.

He said since the uproar, he has championed other politicians to lend support to Jindal’s veto.

“It was the right thing to do, and I’m glad he did it,” said Burns, a private lawyer who voted for the raise but said he would donate the money to charity.

“It really threatened to undermine our agenda. It was an episode we knew we had to get past. Any responsible person knew this wasn’t going over well.”

Cromer, however, doesn’t believe the veto is the closing credits to the legislative soap opera.

“I think it’s going to come back,” Cromer said of the pay raise. “If you want decent people, you have to be compensated.”


Comments

5 comment(s)

    dixiedoxies wrote on Jul 2, 2008 4:04 PM:

    " I don't understand why it's taken this long. I'll sign a petition! "

    Kathy wrote on Jul 2, 2008 2:28 PM:

    " Should recall all up there who VOTED FOR the pay raise. Who among us can give themselves a raise? or gets one a month or two into a job? This was an insult to the voters of this State. "

    Samantha V wrote on Jul 2, 2008 11:45 AM:

    " I agree, Who wants to join me in starting a recall on Greg "Croney" Cromer? "

    Henry wrote on Jul 2, 2008 11:42 AM:

    " “I think it’s going to come back,” Cromer said of the pay raise. “If you want decent people, you have to be compensated.”

    So is he saying he isn't a decent person? hmmm.....
    He is probaly one of the most arrogant and ignorant person on the legislator, We should all be ashamed for voting him in office. He needs to be recalled
    Along with Ann Duplessis, she is so dilusional "

    dixiedoxies wrote on Jul 2, 2008 10:56 AM:

    " Greg Cromer's view on increasing compensation to increase quality employees wasn't strong enough to prevent him from voting against an employee pay raise when he was a city councilman.

    It will possibly affect you more than one iota - if the voters remember how you voted. "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The St. Tammany News is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in thesttammanynews.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the St. Tammany News. The St. Tammany News does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized St. Tammany News spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count: