Truck stop closures cause conflict

Not favorable to bring in new businesses, local leaders say

By Matthew Penix
St. Tammany News
Published on Monday, April 28, 2008 9:04 AM CDT



Local business and government leaders must dig deep and rack educated minds together to form solutions to bring new truck stops to the region if the area wants to prove itself as business friendly, said Sandra Slifer, director for the civic group Tammany Together.

Speaking at the group’s membership meeting Monday, Slifer questioned the wisdom of the state Department of Transportation and Development to shut down 14 of the state’s 34 rest stops due to lack of funding.

“This is not a favorable position to bring in businesses and have nowhere for their (truck haulers) to go,” Slifer said.

The issue made headlines recently when Tammany Together questioned the safety of truck drivers parking on interstate exit and off ramps.

But with truckers facing federal guidelines to stop after 14 to 16 hours of driving, and pressure from companies to increase delivery times, truck drivers complained they were sandwiched in a catch 22. Coupled with a DOTD movement to tear down or abandon 70 percent of the state’s truck stops, the issues are adding gas to an already flammable situation.

“This is the perfect thing to lobby for as part of the overall solution,” said one Tammany Together member, who wished not to be identified. “Right now it’s a mess.”

The members were directing comments to Brenda Reine-Bertus, executive director of the St. Tammany Parish Economic Development Foundation and the I-12 Business Alliance, a group of business leaders who are touting a swath of interstate from St. Helena, Washington, Tangipahoa, St. Tammany and Livingston parishes as a crucial corridor for new business attraction.

“This is part of the solution that needs to be worked out by the I-12 alliance,” Slifer said.

Reine-Bertus agreed.

“We know that a state, parish or city can’t be stagnant,” she said. “It can’t stop when it’s got momentum.”


Comments

4 comment(s)

    Arthur wrote on May 1, 2008 11:27 AM:

    " Steve, the trucks were there before anything else, deal with it or find another route. I apologize for sounding off but i m tired of four wheelers complaining about the heartbeat of America getting in their way. Truck drivers have a difficult time as it is, no one respects them or even wants them around.Yet they love the gadgets they carry.We need to find a way to make their job a bit easier to help stimulate the economy in general. Why not get local companies to adopt a rest area and take care of it? Good PR for them? "

    Truck stop vs rest area wrote on Apr 28, 2008 8:52 PM:

    " A truck stop would be like a T/A, Flying J or Pilot. A rest area is like, well a rest area. The DOTD has no authority to close or tear down a truck stop. (?) Rest areas, yes, but not a truck stop. These are privately owned businesses.
    As fuel prices continue to climb, the issue may be a moot one, I am afraid. You won't have to worry about truckers because there won't be any left.
    "

    Tired too wrote on Apr 28, 2008 8:43 PM:

    " Steve, how many cars do the same thing multiplied by the hundreds? Get over it.
    The drivers of big rigs are allowed to drive 11 hours per day; our work day must be complete after 14 hours on duty. This 14 hours includes time spent at a loading dock, eating lunch or fueling at a truck stop or whatever. If I sit at a dock for six hours, then take that from the 14 (leaves 8) then I am allowed to drive 8 hours before I must stop and take 10 hour off duty. "

    Steve wrote on Apr 28, 2008 12:29 PM:

    " I wish they would move the T@A on Gause and I-10. I'm really tired of getting stuck in traffic because 2 or 3 18 wheelers run the red light at the same time,causing a traffic jam all the way down Gause. "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The St. Tammany News is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in thesttammanynews.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the St. Tammany News. The St. Tammany News does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized St. Tammany News spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count: